Compare / BipPass vs Infisical
BipPass vs Infisical: end-to-end encryption by default
Checked September 26, 2026
Infisical is open source and self-hostable, and decrypts secrets on its server. BipPass is hosted and end-to-end encrypted, so its server never can.
| BipPass | Infisical | |
|---|---|---|
| Can the vendor decrypt your secrets? | No. Values are encrypted on your device; the server stores ciphertext it has no key for | Yes. The server decrypts data before responding; end-to-end encryption stopped being the default in 2023 |
| Inject into a process | bippass run -- <cmd> | infisical run -- <cmd> |
| AI coding agents | MCP server with no tool that returns a value; command output is scrubbed | Not compared here |
| Pricing | Free for up to 3 people; then $6 (Basic) or $15 (Professional) per member per month | Free for 5 identities; Pro $23 and Advanced $46 per identity per month (people and machines both count) |
| Self-hosting | No — hosted service | Yes, free for the MIT-licensed core |
| Open source | No | Yes — MIT, with an enterprise directory under a commercial licence |
Where they differ
Infisical started out end-to-end encrypted and moved to server-side encryption in 2023, which made features such as secret syncs and integrations possible. Its documentation describes the server retrieving and decrypting data before it responds. BipPass kept the other side of that trade: the server stores ciphertext only, and the features are built around that.
What Infisical does better
Infisical is genuinely open source and you can run it yourself for free. It is also much broader than a secrets manager, with PKI, privileged access and KMS features. If self-hosting or an open codebase is a requirement, BipPass does not meet it today.
Sources
- Infisical security internals
- Infisical update, June 2023
- Infisical pricing
- infisical run
- Infisical on GitHub
Something out of date? Tell us at support@bippass.com and we will correct it.